Let's Forever Link Gun Violence & Mental Health Together

Solve the gun violence problem by assigning fees to everything related to gun violence and putting those fees to work in our failing mental health system and programs.

I promised myself I wasn't going to write this blog. I wanted to, even thought I needed to, but could find no good reason to write it. That was until just a short few hours ago. A few short hours ago (currently 7pm on Dec. 21), Jeffrey Michael took the lives of 4 people and injured 3 State Troopers in Hollidaysburg, Pa. Like many of you, I was at a loss for words over the events in Newtown, CT. I am the father to a beautiful 5-year old in Kindergarten and I have spent much of my last few days wondering how someone could do such a thing. For that very reason I wasn't going to write what would have become a very emotional blog. But I had to and here's why-

Guns are not the problem. A study  estimated there were 270 million guns owned by private citizens in the United States in 2007. That was 5 years ago. There are an estimated 311 million people in the US. My point is if guns were the problem, there would be a lot less of us considering how many guns are out there. 

So here is my point in this whole diatribe: If we take away the gun issue, if only for a moment, and look at WHO is committing these crimes, you will notice something. In profiling, you look for certain commonalities. (Read Profiling Mass Murders , if you still don't get it). They were all mentally challenged in one form or another.

"We have slowly dismantled a public mental health system that has limited resources to deal with dangerous psychiatric illnesses" wrote Jackie Chazan. "No longer do we hospitalize individuals with profound mental illness -- the state institutions in many states shuttered their doors long ago. Instead, we rely on..., mental health emergency rooms, and short-term psychiatric hospitalizations with uncertain follow-up of patients with critical problems." (Read the whole article here). Why did we dismantle the system? In 1999, the State of Georgia lost a case in the Supreme Court whereby mental health patients were thought to be able to get equally effective treatment in their communities rather than state-run mental health hospitals.

The problem is local communities do not have the resources to administer truly effective mental health solutions complete with follow-up services. The money isn't there folks. So every day, the people who need help are not receiving it. Instead, they simply go about their lives, often showing signs of severe mental issues and nothing is done about it. Nothing. But when those same people who have mental health issues take the lives of innocent men, women and children, we rush to blame the guns. But the core issue is inadequate mental health services.

So let's forever link the two issues together: Guns and Mental Health. Want a firearms permit to buy a gun? It will cost you $400; $50 for processing and $350 for the mental health system. And just like your driver's license, it will expire in 5 years, so we will need to see you back here, just to make sure you are still sane and have the ability to properly handle a firearm. And another $400. Want to buy a gun with that new permit? That will cost you an additional $1,000 on top of the price of the gun. We need that money for mental health treatment to prevent mass killings. And we need you to register that firearm every year, just as you do your automobile, every year on your birthday. Just bring in your firearm(s) when you are registering your vehicle(s) so we can keep up with who owns what and bring a $100 for every pistol, $150 for rifles, $200 for anything that is semi-automatic. Oh, and if you have a rifle or a shot gun, regardless of what you have it for, we are going to charge you for a yearly hunting license. Because that is why you own an AR-15 right? For hunting? That will be an additional $200.

Bullets? Add an additional $100 on that box of 50. We need that to fund our mental health programs. That trip to the firing range just got a lot more expensive, but there are far fewer shooting incidents. Bullet proof vest? Tack on an extra $1,200 to give to the local police in the event someone injures or kills one of them while trying to subdue someone wearing one of those. And let's not forget the first-person shooter video games. In order to keep these games from becoming an influence on people who cannot determine right from wrong, violent games will cost you an additional $150 each. We need that money to prevent innocent children from becoming victims.

So everyone gets what they want and need without taking away any guns from owners or restricting the purchase of firearms or ammo. And if you actually feed your family with the animals you kill while hunting, you can claim up to 200 rounds of ammunition on your taxes because let's face it, if you can't kill one or two deer, some ducks and a few pigs with 200 rounds, you might want to think about trying your hand at fishing. Ever considered going vegan?

Because guns are the easiest way for mentally challenged people to kill other people, gun purchases, ammunition purchases, bullet-proof vests, helmets and other tactical gear sold to civilians should foot the bill for their treatment. When they start using cars, we will start looking at ways to combat that as well, but for right now, if you want to limit the horrendous mix of mental instability and gun violence, you need to treat the cause with the millions of dollars we spend on our right to bear arms.

And to the thousands of outraged gun owners who think this is a tax, what are you willing to give to have just one of those 20 innocent children back with their families? A few extra hundred dollars will go a long way toward preventing the next mentally challenged person from acting out in a similar way. Just remember: Freedom Is Not, Nor Has It Ever Been, FREE! So please pay at the cashier and have a nice day. (Someone pass this on to Joe Biden for me. Tell him I'm doing my part to create a solution). 

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

gdfo January 04, 2013 at 10:08 PM
Not sure what sdfu is. Perhaps you can explain that one. Purposely single in as much as she participated in a divorce, her husband had not abandoned her nor was he killed. Was there inadequatre mental/emotional health care? I do believe so. In an earlier part of the NEWS coverage the young mans obsession with violent videos games was brought out. I did not state at all that I had all the answers. So why do you state that I do/did?
Jair Sweatman January 04, 2013 at 11:13 PM
So here is the problem I have with your comment 'gdfo': What does a single mother, home schooling a son, who may or may not have a physical problem, have to do with a psychotic adult killing kids? I'm really trying to connect the dots between being a single mother and an adult killing kids, because we are talking about an adult who killed his mother and a bunch of kids. I'm only trying to better understand your reasoning in mentioning it. In your opinion, the problem is "... that a purposely single mother was raising a son who was home schooled because he had a physical problem and perhaps emotional imbalances also." Pardon me, but I don't see a problem with a single mother raising a son and home schooling him. I would applaud a single mother who has the time and ability, not to mention the financial resources, to home school her child. I don't understand what physical problem he may or may not have had and how it contributed to the violent act he carried out. In the meantime, please Google 'Irony', 'gdfo' and 'sdfu'.
gdfo January 05, 2013 at 01:28 PM
Actually, you used the term sdfu. I did not. So I will not google it, nor look it up. It has some meaning to you and perhaps other folks. Either you can explain it or not. Within 2 days fo the Ct shooting, it was reported in the NEWS that Adam Lanza suffered from a condition in which he did not, at least on some parts of this skin or body, feel pain. There was referrence to a class in which the instructor noticed Adam bleeding from injury to his hands or arms while working on a specific project at school. This had happened more than once. He was also reported to have been very withdrawn and troublesome at school. He was taken out of school and was home schooled for those reasons. More later on the phenomena of single mothers raising violent teenagers.
Jair Sweatman January 05, 2013 at 09:13 PM
George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were raised by a single mother. Add Bill Cosby, Ed Bradley, Alicia Keys, Angelia Jolie, Matt Damon, Aubrey Hepburn, Oprah Winfrey, Jack Nicholson and Al Pacino. Surely, they all must have been violent teenagers because they grew up in a single parent household led by a woman. Let's look at the numbers involved in your theory that attacks single mothers: According to the U.S. Census Bureau, there are approximately 13.6 million single parents raising 21.2 million children in this country. 72 percent of black children are raised in single parent households, but the majority of serial/mass killers are white. Your theory is dangerous gdfo because it makes irrational assumptions and conclusions and stigmatizes single mothers unfairly. We can no more conclude that white people are more dangerous and prone to mental illness than you can conclude that single mothers raise troubled teenagers. There are more white people and more single mothers, so the majority of the time, the odds of it being a white person raised in a single parent household will prevail. Solutions, not creating some moral or ethical case against the world as you see it, are what we need. You can pass judgement on others in your world, but the one we share with others find passing judgement as helpful as passing gas. You might be relieved, but to the rest of us, it just stinks.
ns January 12, 2013 at 08:50 AM
Systematic activities to prevent or cure health problems and promote good health in humans are undertaken by health care providers. Applications with regard to animal health are covered by the veterinary sciences. Thanks. http://www.weightlosspunch.com/


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »