.
Feedback

Mitt Romney Wins Georgia

Voters in Georgia on Tuesday cast their ballot for Mitt Romney, giving him the state's 16 Electoral votes, according to early results.

In a move that fell in line with expectations, Mitt Romney was projected to win Georgia’s 16 electoral votes on Tuesday, defeating Democrat Barack Obama.

In the 2008 presidential election, the state voted for the Republican candidate, and since the 1990s has voted for the overall winner of the presidential race 3 out of 5 times.

Romney and Obama did not campaign aggressively in Georgia and spent more time visiting the Peach State to raise money. The state has been a Republican stronghold in recent presidential elections. 

The economy was a key issue for many voters in Georgia state, which has had a higher than average unemployment rate.

Turnout was strong in Georgia and early voting was almost as popular this year as four years ago.

Statewide, nearly 1.9 million people voted early. In 2008, there were a little more than 2 million early ballots cast. And on Tuesday, many polling places reported steady or heavy turnout despite chilly, rainy weather as the polls opened.

At Kennesaw Elementary School, Charyl Stevenson voted for Mitt Romney.

"I'm ready for some change. Hopefully that's what's gonna happen in the next four years if he's elected," Stevenson said. "If not, I'm gonna pray real hard that Obama is gonna do something different because more of the same is not working."

At Towne Lake Community Church in Woodstock, Ken McGhee was eager to cast his ballot for Romney on Tuesday afternoon. "I think this is the true change we need to believe in," McGhee said.

In 2008, Georgia voters went for John McCain over Obama by 52.2% to 47%.

To keep up with Georgia's Charter School Amendment and other races, please see:

Georgia Votes: Stay With Patch for Live Election Results

Eddie E. November 9, 2012 at 02:57 am
It is a long established pattern in our little state.
Remember, many people here think 'Gone With the Wind' was real and they believe it should be celebrated!
Ground Chuck November 9, 2012 at 03:02 am
Wil, Wil, Wil. You must not be familiar with the Fox News demographics. Quite the opposite of your description as statistics indicate a cross reference of whites and blacks with advanced education and stable incomes. Clearly you are one of those "angries" that hates Republicans and probably white middle class and upper class people in general. It's someone else's fault that you have your personal shortcomings and struggles, right? You voted for Obama because you are certain he will seize other people's assets and hand them to you since you have done more in your own mind to deserve them, right?
Wil November 9, 2012 at 03:04 am
GO OBAMA
Chris November 9, 2012 at 03:17 am
Ignorance is bliss Jerry. Please don't ruin these - Dreams From Their Father.
When Stuff hits the fan in a few years, the bloodsucker Obama voters will be unprepared as usual and THEY will be the occuturds all upset and burning cities like happening now in Greece. These people believe if they keep playing the lottery with other people's money, one day they will be on top of the world. In reality, they will always be a spore in a cow patty.
R November 9, 2012 at 03:35 am
Try 1980 - 1984 it isn't THAT hard...
Then it capped during the Administration of Gov Barnes
R November 9, 2012 at 03:40 am
The weather since the election appears to concur ...
R November 9, 2012 at 03:42 am
ANOTHER of the BUSH era programs Obama just continued...
Sandy November 9, 2012 at 04:03 am
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a free cell phone with free monthly minutes, food stamps, section 8 housing, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.
Registered Republican November 9, 2012 at 12:35 pm
You may be a "WOMAN", but you highlight your lack of intellect by your incorrect spelling/use of the the word "too" (See "to", above). I'll be nice and not mention all the other glaring grammatical errors. Thanks for your opinion but it lacks fact and foundation.
Registered Republican November 9, 2012 at 12:46 pm
PamJ...you obviously don't understand the principles of Obamacare and the Affordable Care Act. If you can't scrape together $ to pay for medical insurance now, how are you going to pay the $2500 fine (errr....tax) for not having mandatory insurance? By the way, Obama isn't paying for your medical insurance...YOU ARE!!! Maybe you ought to cancel your mobile phone subscription and get a land line, shut off the cable tv and stop eating at McDonald's; you'll then be able to afford your medical insurance.
Racer X November 9, 2012 at 01:14 pm
If you look at a map of the US by precincts, nearly the whole country was red with only tiny pinpoints of Blue. The only Blue was metropolitan areas which have higher concentrations of people on the dole.
93% of America's Black population voted for Obama, most based on race (but this is not racism?) alone followed closely by the hopes it will mean more free stuff from America's working class. The Dems have been breeding voters in housing projects for generations and their system has worked for them. Yes, the POTUS is Obama. But, before you tell folks to get over it or move to another country you should think a little more about it. Google "capital flight" and you will see wealth is indeed leaving our country. If Obama stays his course, there will be nothing left to tax and our Middle Class is screwed. Just because Obama was re-elected doesn't make him a good choice. Answer this question: If voting were limited to only people with an IQ of 70 or higher (100 being the median in all IQ tests) , would Obama have still been re-elected? What does the answer tell you? Be honest, not with me, but with yourself.
Ground Chuck November 9, 2012 at 01:30 pm
Dee, you are right! And I am looking forward to actively supporting Marco Rubio in four years when he runs for President in 2016. Oh wait, the Dem machine will say he isn't Latino because he is Republican. Too bad because he will smoke whatever the Dems throw at him including Castro from San Antonio! Looks like a large percentage are supporting minority candidates to appease themselves over the guilt from marginalizing minorities in from generations past. It will be great to see candidates being voted into office again based on the content of their character and capabilities, not because it's the hip thing to do.
Racer X November 9, 2012 at 01:46 pm
Actually, the policies that bred the free cell phones go back to the 90's. In the last three years, however, the free cell phone users have increased 429% in Illinois alone. And yes, it is tax payer money that is paying for them. All government funds belong to tax payers.
Couple that with last February's announcement that all Obama phone users will be entitled to broad band internet for just $10. per month and what you have is vote purchasing, which, by the way, is illegal. Some of you Dems, please, research who is manufacturing the phones. I will give you a hint: It's a guy in Mexico who has donated BIG BUCKS to Obama's campaigns. Check it out.
Ground Chuck November 9, 2012 at 01:50 pm
I suspect Obama may actually move a little towards the center like Clinton did. Hope so, because the country cannot sustain the social programs in place, even with the coming tax increase. He knows he must get jobs imported back to the U.S. if the current situation continues, and the bottom drops out, you will be facing extreme measures by people who no longer can access the free stuff and benefits. One German academic and a New Mexico political figure likened the potential situation as a coming revolution. Better stock up on those weapons and ammo if you believe they are right!
Rebecca McCarthy (Editor) November 9, 2012 at 02:00 pm
The US Census shows that people who identify themselves as black comprise 13 percent of the country's population. I am not sure how a mere 13 percent (if they all indeed did vote Democratic) of the population propelled the President back into office. Maybe you can explain. Yes, wealth is leaving the country. In the last days of the campaign, George W. Bush was at a Caribbean conference, telling those in attendance how to shelter their money offshore. And, goodness me, Newt himself said during the primary season, “I don’t know of any American president who has had a Swiss bank account.” Mr. Romney does, plus other interests in tax havens like Bermuda and the Caymans. Talk about wealth leaving the country! this was long before his failed run for President.
BStein November 9, 2012 at 02:03 pm
Ground Chuck. I know you want to appease yourself into thinking that many people voted for President Obama because of his race or because they feel bad about marginilizing minorities in the past. I'm here to tell you that's the farthest thing from the truth. He was the better candidate, with better ideas, more specificity. 2016 is a long time away.
Sharon Swanepoel (Editor) November 9, 2012 at 02:17 pm
Robert, this conversation has been going on for 3 days now, which is why it is still alive. We welcome the conversation. However, if you look at the published time on the top of the story you will see that this was a breaking news story early on the evening of the election when the full outcome of the election was not known, but it had been announced the Romney had won Georgia.
Racer X November 9, 2012 at 02:24 pm
RM- But what do you think we should do to keep wealth in this country? That is the question. So far, we are running it off.
As far as Romney having a Swiss bank account (which I don't know to be true), that's just good business. When there are robbers around, you bury your money, common sense. As far as 13% affecting the vote, the difference in the popular vote was only 2.48%. Use your head. It's easy to counter the Romney being the first President with a Swiss bank account with Obama being the first President with an illegal alien fugitive uncle living in the US. How about explaining who is behind this website, please: http://obamaphone.net/ I'm not hating. I am just weary of people ignoring what is put right in front of them.
Hermann Zwergel November 9, 2012 at 02:29 pm
why did such a low percent of Republicans vote?
Pete November 9, 2012 at 02:31 pm
@Racer X - keep in mind, it was mainly republican lawmakers that redrew districts after the last census. And why should some hick in east bum determine the results for someone living in a capital city? It's unfortunately the way things are - archaic rules and old world thinking in a different century
Although you are right - Obama being re-lected didn't make him a good choice - but in a race where we were not given good choices, America chose the lesser of two evils..
Pam J November 9, 2012 at 04:33 pm
Apparently all of you haven't read the whole bill. If you can't afford insurance, you will not be fined. Each state will have the chance to set up a bank of companies to get free health care if you fall below the poverty line. If the state chooses not to do that, the federal government will kick in. If you read the whole bill, you won't be so scared of it. And Jerry, I have a cell phone (that I've had for years) that I use basically for emergencies, my mother (who I live with) has cable TV. We go out to eat and she pays. I don't get any government aid. Because I have family to take care of me and because I chose to change my life completely and move in with family members, I don't qualify for any kind of aid. So, don't worry, you are not paying any of my bills for me.
Ground Chuck November 9, 2012 at 11:49 pm
PamJ, Madam Pelosi should hire you to read the bills that she votes FOR since she is too busy to read them herself!
Ground Chuck November 9, 2012 at 11:51 pm
BStein, you can believe that if you choose. However, you are wrong. Obama's support within the African-American community was 93%, and nearly 100% of those votes were cast for Obama because of his skin color PERIOD.
Ground Chuck November 9, 2012 at 11:53 pm
P.S. I can't blame them for that since I am privately educated and quite familiar with their plight in American history.
Pam J November 10, 2012 at 02:00 am
Ground Chuck (and it's really hard to not smile when I type your "name"), that is funny. But I would be happy to work for Madam Pelosi. Heck, I would be happy to work for Mitt Romney. When it comes to a good job, it doesn't matter who it is. I've worked in professional offices my whole life and I'm applying for jobs at places I never thought I would apply at. So you ain't gonna bother me with your comment.
Jenny Diehl November 10, 2012 at 06:02 am
Please stop calling the Medicare and Social Security I had deducted from every paycheck for forty plus years "free stuff and benefits". My money was not "free". I earned it weekly from minimum wage on up. Now that I need the money I put into these programs, I keep hearing people talk about getting Medicare and Social Security as if I was leaching off the backs off working people. I worked the jobs, I had payments deducted. It was, and is , my money. There is nothing "free" about it.
Ground Chuck November 11, 2012 at 12:25 am
Jenny, that is not what people are referring to. They are referencing the benefits such as welfare, food stamps, subsidies, etc. Benefits for doing nothing and not working have surpassed the nation's median income as of last year. That means it is cheaper to just sit at home, do nothing and wait for all flavors of government benefit checks. No, this is not retirement I am talking about.
Ground Chuck November 11, 2012 at 12:29 am
And Pam, certainly was not trying to offend you. Pelosi actually came out and said that the House should pass the Healthcare Bill so they could all find out what was in it. Scary since she didn't have time to read it.
Byron Rangitsch November 11, 2012 at 01:25 pm
You referring to the Cato analysis? It includes Medicaid in its assessment of equivalent wage. Also, the fact that the equivalent welfare wage ranges from 5.53 in Mississippi and 17.50 in Hawaii suggests that it's not federal policy.
These entitlement talking points have to include retirement, college tuition, and everything else to get their numbers. Federal welfare/Chip/food stamps was $468billion.
Pam J November 11, 2012 at 03:16 pm
Most people cannot survive on welfare and food stamps. You cannot pay your mortgage or rent and all of your utilities. I admit that you can "adjust" to having less money, but it's not really a fun place to be. There have always been people who will take advantage of the system, but the increase in costs for these programs is, in a bit part, due to high unemployment. If companies would stop discriminating against unemployment people, the number of people getting benefits would drop. I don't get any aid because I apparently don't qualify, so I'm not costing you anything. I just hope that none of you ever have to apply for government aid.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Virginia Highland-Druid Hills Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jeff Young January 26, 2013 at 08:38 pm
Ms. Sears, Clearly, you don't want to engage in a reasoned debate on this issue. When you wroteRead More "let's work together" you forgot to add "so long as we do it my way." If your real concern was removing invasive non-native plants, would you be spending all this time and effort raising money to build expensive bridges and a 31 mile trail?
Jeff Young January 26, 2013 at 08:42 pm
Since our announcement unveiling the PMG web site, I have been waiting to see if anyone from SFCRead More would substantively address the thoroughly reasoned positions and impressive factual sources you will find if you visit the PMG web site. But no, and at first you might think that it’s the few pro-SFC commenters who are the small, but loud minority. However, SFC all along has chosen to work behind the scenes, as though they were trained in Washington politics. They don’t want to face up to neighbor concerns, or new academic research on trails, or even have to provide half-detailed specifications to justify the cost and impact of their grandiose scheme. Could it be they know how to obtain funding and approvals the political way, without the bothersome public? Could it be they know what is good for the rest of us and just need us to shut up? What country is this? Here is an example. SFC managed to get DeKalb County to file a grant application with the State without any public hearing, telling the County Commission that the community supports the SFC connected trail plan, and seeking funds for connecting Zonolite park to their other proposed trails. This contradicted what SFC told MLPA, that connecting trails were not part of the Zonolite work. And, SFC did not tell the Commission or the State about the negative feedback acknowledged in the Park Pride Report. (continued)
Jeff Young January 26, 2013 at 08:43 pm
At that MLPA meeting, PMG’s position was that we would not oppose work confined to ZonoliteRead More that was not for connecting to the larger SFC trail plan, if that was the result of an open process involving the impacted neighbors and businesses. Did we feel snookered by the DeKalb grant application? You bet. So what I say to SFC is: let’s debate this out in the open and have the same sort of dialog we all now expect when the use of property is taken up a notch, whether it’s a for condo, or a road widening, or a re-zoning, or a trail. PMG will keep on sharing facts with decision makers and impacted neighbors until that happens.