.
Feedback

Buckhead Walmart Project Overcomes Zoning Hurdle

The city council is expected to make a final decision on the Lindbergh redevelopment on Monday, Oct. 1

 

The controversial Lindbergh redevelopment project is back on the Atlanta city council agenda.

The zoning committee approved the mixed-use project that would bring Walmart to Lindbergh Drive, with the condition that some of the housing planned for the property is used as affordable housing for seniors.

The full council is expected to vote on the project on Monday, Oct. 1 during the full council meeting.

Developers want to build a mixed-use development that would include a Walmart off Lindbergh Drive near the MARTA station.

But the property is zoned for residential use, and the project failed to move forward until the council's zoning committee approved a land use change.

City councilman Alex Wan told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution "not a good enough case has been made" to change the use of the land.

"I have yet to see or hear a compelling argument to say, ‘Yes, we need to change it,’" Wan said. "There should be data saying there is a higher and better use of this land."

Earlier this month, the council voted to send the proposal back to committee in an effort to resolve the land use issue.

Plans include 200,000 square feet of retail space and roughly 200 apartments.

Developer Jeff Fuqua has been working on the $80 million project for nearly two years.

Do you support the project? Tell us in the comments area below.

 

Related articles:

  • Councilman Shook Weighs in on Lindbergh 'Big Box'
  • Zoning Review Board Approves Lindbergh Develoment
  • Opposition to Lindbergh Project Builds
  • Lindbergh 'Big Box’ Development Again Denied by NPU-B
  • City Council Delays Vote on Walmart Development
FamilyOfFour September 28, 2012 at 08:17 pm
What I have noticed all over Atlanta is that it is hard to find single level family rentals. All "family" style rentals are always condo style townhomes that are 3+ stories high! Why can't they just built some high rises with 3 bedroom units in them without them being the 1 "penthouse" in the development that costs $6K/mo? 3 bedroom homes intown are cheaper to rent than a 2 bed apartment. If you have kids, you want to spend free time WITH your kids not taking care of a oversized home. Also so many of us want smaller living quarters because we want to lessen our carbon footprints and save money for more vacations. :) I choose Europe any day over a lawn and another bathroom reno!
Terry Smith September 30, 2012 at 08:42 pm
Just what we need, another wallmart shoved down our throats. I'll do without before i spend one penny with the Spawn of Satan. and a thousand curses upon the developer.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Virginia Highland-Druid Hills Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Jeff Young January 26, 2013 at 08:38 pm
Ms. Sears, Clearly, you don't want to engage in a reasoned debate on this issue. When you wroteRead More "let's work together" you forgot to add "so long as we do it my way." If your real concern was removing invasive non-native plants, would you be spending all this time and effort raising money to build expensive bridges and a 31 mile trail?
Jeff Young January 26, 2013 at 08:42 pm
Since our announcement unveiling the PMG web site, I have been waiting to see if anyone from SFCRead More would substantively address the thoroughly reasoned positions and impressive factual sources you will find if you visit the PMG web site. But no, and at first you might think that it’s the few pro-SFC commenters who are the small, but loud minority. However, SFC all along has chosen to work behind the scenes, as though they were trained in Washington politics. They don’t want to face up to neighbor concerns, or new academic research on trails, or even have to provide half-detailed specifications to justify the cost and impact of their grandiose scheme. Could it be they know how to obtain funding and approvals the political way, without the bothersome public? Could it be they know what is good for the rest of us and just need us to shut up? What country is this? Here is an example. SFC managed to get DeKalb County to file a grant application with the State without any public hearing, telling the County Commission that the community supports the SFC connected trail plan, and seeking funds for connecting Zonolite park to their other proposed trails. This contradicted what SFC told MLPA, that connecting trails were not part of the Zonolite work. And, SFC did not tell the Commission or the State about the negative feedback acknowledged in the Park Pride Report. (continued)
Jeff Young January 26, 2013 at 08:43 pm
At that MLPA meeting, PMG’s position was that we would not oppose work confined to ZonoliteRead More that was not for connecting to the larger SFC trail plan, if that was the result of an open process involving the impacted neighbors and businesses. Did we feel snookered by the DeKalb grant application? You bet. So what I say to SFC is: let’s debate this out in the open and have the same sort of dialog we all now expect when the use of property is taken up a notch, whether it’s a for condo, or a road widening, or a re-zoning, or a trail. PMG will keep on sharing facts with decision makers and impacted neighbors until that happens.